Incidence of cancer diagnosis and cancer care before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in French Polynesia TEAHUPOO study

Background: Cancer care in French Polynesia has been deprioritized during severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS CoV2) pandemic due to the urgent necessity to reorganize health care systems to fight this crisis and patients (pts) were more reluctant to visit medical doctors, fearful about exposure to the virus or not wanting to disturb a saturated health system. Method(s): We aimed to assess the incidence of cancer diagnosis and cancer care during the Covid-19 period compared to the same period in 2019 (before covid) and in 2021 (after covid). We retrospectively collected data from January 2019 to Sept 2021 regarding pts visits, treatments (ttt) administrations in oncology and radiotherapy outpatient wards, at the Taaone university hospital center of French Polynesia. Result(s): Regarding the newly diagnosed pts, we observed a decreased of 13.6% on oncology visits from January to Sept 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 and an increase of oncology visits after the first wave with +14.2%, from January to Sept 2021 compared to 2020. We did not observe any major impact of the crisis on ttt administrations in oncology outpatients. There was a +1.3% of activity from January to Sept 2020 compared to 2019 and a +1.5% from January to Sept 2021 compare to 2020. Regarding the radiotherapy activity, the newly diagnosed pts visits increased of +2.5% from January to Sept 2020 compared to the same period in 2019 and +21% from January to Sept 2021 compared to the same period in 2020. The ttts in radiotherapy outpatient wards decreased of -11% in 2020 (from January to Sept 2020 compared to 2019) and increased of +11% in 2021. Conclusion(s): The covid 19 crisis had an impact in French Polynesia on the oncology and radiotherapy visit of the newly diagnosed patients, with more patients diagnosed after covid;while ttt administrations in oncology and radiotherapy stayed stable. Legal entity responsible for the study: The authors. Funding(s): Has not received any funding. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Copyright © 2022

Study of patients’ characteristics associated with osimertinib outcomes upfront or in following lines in EGFR-positive NSCLC

Background: In first line (L1) for EGFR-mutated (mEGFR) advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC), osimertinib (osi) has been the preferred option since 2018. First generation anti-EGFR TKI (1G) alone followed by osi, or 1G + anti-angiogenic or 1G + chemotherapy are other options. We aimed to assess the subgroups of patients (pts) that do not benefit from 1G alone compared with osimertinib L1 in mEGFR aNSCLC. Methods: Retrospective international study including pts with mEGFR aNSCLC treated with either osi or the sequence of 1G followed by osi (seq group). Primary endpoint was the PFS of the global strategy (PFSglob) defined as the time between L1 start and progression after L2 treatment or death. Subgroups analyses included pts with high tumour burden (high-TM;> 3 metastatic sites and/or central nervous system (CNS) involvement), poor performance status (PS), and T790M negative (seq subgroup only). Results: A total of 235 pts were included: 104 in the seq group, 118 in the osi L1 group. 15 had T790M negative at PD after 1G, they received osi as a therapeutic test. From these pts, 222 had an exon19 or 21 EGFR mut, 13 had uncommon mEGFR. Mean age was 65 years, 64% were female, and 60% never smokers. Pts from the osi L1 group had poorer PS (23% vs 10%), higher rate of co-mutations (23% vs 19%) and more CNS involvement (47% vs 19%). After a median (m) follow up of 30.6 months in the exon 19 and 21 population, mPFSglob was 27.4 mo (23.0-31.0) and mPFS L1 was 15.5mo (13.7-18.4) Table. The sequence was associated with shorter PFS L1 compared with osi L1 particularly in high-TM (10.5 mo vs 17.1 mo, p<0.0001);PFS was numerically shorter in poor PS (≥2) population (11.0 mo vs 15.6 mo, p=0.1). [Formula presented] Conclusions: 1G TKI followed by osi seemed to be detrimental compared with os L1 for pts with high-TM or poor PS mEGFR aNSCLC. In this population, the intensification of L1 treatment with osimertinib or a combination of 1G with anti-angiogenic or chemotherapy could be the better option in the first-line setting. Updated results will be presented at the congress. Legal entity responsible for the study: Institut Gustave Roussy. Funding: Has not received any funding Disclosure: E. Auclin: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Sanofi, Amgen. N. Girard: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Mirati, Amgen, Novartis, Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Janssen, Boehringer, Novartis, Sanofi, AbbVie, Amgen, Lilly, Grunenthal, Takeda, Owkin;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Local: Roche, Sivan, Janssen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: BMS;Non-Financial Interests, Officer, International Thymic malignancy interest group, president: ITMIG;Other, Other, Family member is an employee: AstraZeneca. M.T. Moran Bueno: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory role: Roche. B. Besse: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: 4D Pharma, AbbVie, Amgen, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cergentis, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Onxeo, Ose Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Takeda, Tolero Pharmaceuticals;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Chugai Pharmaceutical, EISAI, Genzyme Corporation, Inivata, Ipsen, Turning Point Therapeutics. L. Mezquita: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Takeda, AstraZeneca, Roche;Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, BMS, AstraZeneca, Takeda;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant, SEOM Beca Retorno 2019: BI;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant, ESMO TR Research Fellowship 2019: BMS;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, COVID research Grant: Amgen;Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Inivata, Stilla. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

The FLARE score, circulating neutrophils, and association with COVID-19 outcomes in patients with solid tumors

Background: Inflammation and neutrophils play a central role in severe Covid-19 disease. In previous data, we showed that the FLARE score, combining both tumor and Covid-19-induced proinflammatory status (proinflamstatus), predicts early mortality in cancer patients (pts) with Covid-19 infection. We aimed to assess the impact of this score in a larger cohort and characterize the immunophenotype (IF) of circulating neutrophils. Methods: Multicenter retrospective cohort (RC) of pts with cancer and Covid-19 infection across 14 international centers. Circulating inflammatory markers were collected at two timepoints: baseline (-15 to -45d before Covid-19 diagnosis) and Covid-19 diagnosis. Tumor-induced proinflam-status was defined by high dNLR (neutrophils/(leucocytes-neutrophils)> 3) at baseline. Covid-19-induced proinflam-status was defined by +100% increase of dNLR between both timepoints. We built the FLARE score combining both Tumor and Infection-induced inflammation: T+/I+ (poor), if both proinflam-status;T+/I- (T-only), if inflammation only due to tumor;T-/I+ (I-only), if inflammation only due to Covid;T-/I- (favorable), if no proinflam-status. The IF of circulating neutrophils by flow cytometry was determined in a unicenter prospective cohort (PC) of pts with cancer during Covid-19 infection and in healthy volunteers (HV). Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Results: 524 pts were enrolled in the RC with a median follow- up of 84d (95%CI 78-90). Median age was 69 (range 35-98), 52% were male and 78% had baseline PS <1.Thoracic cancers were the most common (26%). 70% had active disease, 51% advanced stage and 57% were under systemic therapy. dNLR was high in 25% at baseline vs 55% at Covid-19 diagnosis. The median dNLR increase between both timepoints was +70% (IQR: 0-349%);42% had +100% increase of dNLR. Pts distribution and mortality across FLARE groups is resumed in the Table. Overall mortality rate was 26%. In multivariate analysis, including gender, stage and PS, the FLARE poor group was independently associated with 30-day mortality [OR 5.27;1.37-20.3]. 44 pts were enrolled in the PC. Median circulating neutrophils were higher in pts with cancer (n=10, 56.7% [IQR: 39-78.4%]) vs HV (n=6, 35.8% [IQR: 25.6-21%]), and particularly higher in pts with cancer and severe Covid-19 infection (n=7, 88.6% [IQR: 80.9-94%] (p=0.003). A more comprehensive characterization of the IF of circulating neutrophils, including Lox1/CD62/CD64, will be presented at ASCO. Conclusions: The FLARE score, combining tumor and Covid-19-induced proinflam-status, can identify the population at higher risk for mortality. A better characterization of circulating neutrophils may help improve the prediction of Covid-19 outcomes in pts with cancer. (Table Presented).

First results of the COCO study: COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer

Background: COVID-19 pandemic has drastically changed the management of patients with cancer;however, limited data exists regarding which pre-conditions affect the course of COVID-19 infection. Here, we sought to assess the clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 infection in a large cohort of patients with cancer. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection by RT-PCR/Ag detection (n=274) or CT-scan (N=13) between 7/March and 30/April across 12 international centers. Clinical, pathological and biological data were collected. Primary endpoints were 30-day mortality rate and the rate of severe acute respiratory failure (SARF), defined by oxygen requirements >15 L/min. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: 287 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 23 days [95%CI 22-26]. Median age was 69 (range 35-98), 52% were male, 49% had hypertension and 23% had cardiovascular disease. As per cancer characteristics, 68% had active disease, 52% advanced stage and 79% had a baseline ECOG PS ≤1. Most frequent cancer-types were: 26% thoracic, 21% gastrointestinal, 19% breast and 15% genitourinary. Most patients (61%) were under systemic therapy, including chemotherapy (51%), endocrine therapy (23%) and immunotherapy (19%). At COVID-19 diagnosis, 44% of patients had moderate/severe symptoms such as fever (70%), cough (54%) and dyspnea (48%). The majority of patients (90%) required in-patient management and the median hospital stay duration was 10 days (range 1-52);8% of patients required intermediate or intensive care unit admission. Patients received treatment with: hydroxychloroquine (81%), azithromycin (61%), antiviral therapy (38%) and immunomodulatory drugs (14%). Finally, the overall mortality rate was 27% and the rate of SARF was 26%. In patients admitted to intermediate/intensive care units, the mortality and SARF rates were 45% and 73%, respectively. Mortality rate according to ECOG PS before COVID-19 was 20% in PS≤1 and 51% in PS>2 (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Patients with cancer are a susceptible population with a high likelihood of severe complications and high mortality from COVID-19 infection. Final results and treatment outcomes will be presented at the ESMO Congress. Legal entity responsible for the study: Aleix Prat. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: E. Auclin: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Mundipharma;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Sanofi Genzymes. S. Pilotto: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Astra-Zeneca;Eli-Lilly;BMS;Boehringer Ingelheim;MSD;Roche. L. Mezquita: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Tecnofarma;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Non-remunerated activity/ies: AstraZeneca;Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche;Research grant/Funding (self): Boehringer Ingelheim. A. Prat: Honoraria (institution), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Roche;Daiichi Sankyo;Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Pfizer;Novartis;Amgen;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: BMS;Advisory/Consultancy: Puma;Oncolytics Biotech;MSD;Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: Lilly;Honoraria (institution), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Nanostring technologies;Officer/Board of Directors: Breast International Group;Officer/Board of Directors: Solti's Foundation;Leadership role: Actitud Frente al Cancer Foundation;Honoraria (institution): Boehringer;Honoraria (institution): Sysmex Europa GmbH;Honoraria (institution): Medica Scientia inno. Research;Honoraria (institution): Celgene;Honoraria (institution): Astellas Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Change of circulating pro-inflammatory markers between pre-COVID-19 condition and COVID-19 diagnosis predicts early death in cancer patients: The FLARE score

Background: Inflammation plays a central role in severe COVID-19 disease. Likewise, in cancer patients (pts), a circulating pro-inflammatory status (proinflam-status) is associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to assess if a proinflam-status induced by cancer can negatively impact on COVID-19 outcomes. Methods: Multicenter retrospective cohort of cancer pts with SARS-CoV-2 infection across 12 international centers. Circulating inflammatory markers were collected at two timepoints: pre-COVID condition (-15 to -45d before COVID-19 diagnosis) and COVID-19 diagnosis. Tumor-induced proinflam-status was defined by high derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR>3) at pre-COVID condition. COVID-induced proinflam-status was defined by +100% increase of dNLR between both timepoints. We built the FLARE score, combining both Tumor and Infection-induced inflammation: T+/I+ (poor), if both proinflam-status;T+/I- (T-only), if inflammation only due to tumor;T-/I+ (I-only), if inflammation only due to COVID;and T-/I- (favorable), if no inflam-status. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Results: 287 pts were enrolled with a median follow-up of 23d [95%CI 22-26]. Median age was 69 (range 35-98), 52% were male and 49% had hypertension. As per cancer characteristics: 68% had active disease, 52% advanced stage and 79% had a baseline PS≤1. Thoracic cancers were the most common (26%) and 61% of pts were under systemic therapy. The dNLR was high in 24% at pre-COVID condition vs. 55% at COVID-19 diagnosis. Median change between both timepoints was +67% (IQR: 0% to +153%);40% had +100% increase of dNLR. Pts distribution across FLARE groups were: 5% in poor (n=9), 20% in T-only (n=39), 35% in I-only (n=69) and 40% in favorable (n=80). Overall mortality rate was 27%. According to FLARE score: 67% mortality for poor vs. 35% for I-only vs. 33% for T-only vs. 19% in favorable group (p=0.008). The FLARE poor group was independently associated with 30-day mortality [OR 5.7;1.02-31.2]. Conclusions: Both tumor and infection-induced proinflam-status impact on COVID-19 outcomes in cancer pts. The FLARE score, based on simple dynamics between two timepoints, allows to identify the population at higher risk for early death. Legal entity responsible for the study: Aleix Prat. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: E. Auclin: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Mundipharma;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Sanofi Genzymes. S. Pilotto: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca;Eli-Lilly;BMS;Boehringer Ingelheim;MSD;Roche. A. Prat: Honoraria (institution), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Roche;Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Pfizer;Novartis;Amgen;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: BMS;Honoraria (institution), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Daiichi Sankyo;Nanostring technologies;Advisory/Consultancy: Puma;Oncolytics Biotech;MSD;Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: Lilly;Honoraria (institution): Boehringer;Sysmex Europa GmbH;Medica Scientia inno. Research;Celgene;Astellas Pharma;Officer/Board of Directors: Breast International Group;Solti's Foundation;Leadership role: Actitud Frente al Cancer Foundation. L. Mezquita: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Tecnofarma;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Non-remunerated activity/ies: AstraZeneca;Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche;Research grant/Funding (self): Boehringer Ingelheim. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Active smoking and severity of COVID-19 infection in cancer patients

Background: Smoking is the leading cause of cancer worldwide. Active smoking alters the inflammatory environment of the respiratory epithelium, increasing the production of potent pro-inflammatory cytokines that promote the recruitment of macrophages and neutrophils, leading to lung damage. We hypothesize that smoking-induced inflammation can impact on COVID-19 infection severity and mortality related to the proinflammatory cascade. Methods: Multicenter retrospective cohort of cancer patients (pts) with COVID-19 infection diagnosed by PCR/Ag detection (n=274) and CT-scan (N=13) in Mar-Apr/20r in 12 centers. Clinical and biological data were collected. Smoker was defined as active tobacco consumption and heavy smoker as >30 pack-year (PY). Primary endpoints were 30-day mortality rate and the rate of severe acute respiratory failure (SARF), defined by oxygen requirements >15 L/min. Results: A total of 287 pts were enrolled: 25 (9%) were active smokers, 127 (47%) were former and 116 (43%) never smoker. Among active smokers: 73% were heavy smokers, median age was 62y, 60% were male and median body mass index was 22. Regarding their comorbidities: 25% had hypertension, 8% cardiovascular disease, 28% chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and 24% diabetes. Thoracic tumors were the most common (52%), 72% had advanced disease and 56% were under systemic therapy. 92% of active smokers required hospitalization, 68% developed pneumonia and 58% required oxygen. Only 4% were escalated to the intensive care unit. Active smokers received treatment with hydroxychloroquine (91%), azithromycin (61%), antiviral therapy (33%) and steroids (29%). Only 4% received immunomodulatory drugs. SARF was the most common complication (25%) and no thromboembolic events were observed. A pro-inflammatory status was observed at COVID-19 diagnosis in active smokers, e.g. median of absolute neutrophil count was 6.35 (vs. 5.4), mean ferritin was 1269 (vs. 991) and D-Dimer was 2422 (vs. 1816);but with no significant differences. Overall mortality rate was 27%. Mortality rate was higher in active smokers (40% vs. 24% in non-smokers;p=0.08). Conclusions: Active smoking might be associated with severe COVID-19 infection and early death in cancer patients. Smoking induced-inflammation should be further explored. Legal entity responsible for the study: Aleix Prat. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: E. Auclin: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Mundifarma;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Sanofi Genzime. S. Pilotto: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Astra-Zeneca;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Boehringer Ingelheim;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Eli-Lilly;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: BMS. A. Prat: Honoraria (institution), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Roche;Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Pfizer;Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Novartis;Amgen;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: BMS;Honoraria (institution), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Daiichi Sankyo;Nanostring;Advisory/Consultancy: Puma;Oncolytics Biotech;MSD;Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: Lilly;Boehringer;Sysmex Europa GmbH;Medican Scientia inno. Research;Celgene;Astellas;Officer/Board of Directors: Breast International Group;Solti's Foundation;Actitud frente al cancer foundation. L. Mezquita: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bristol-Meyers Squibb;Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Tecnofarma;Honoraria (institution), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Astrazeneca;Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Roche;Research grant/Funding (self): Boehringer Intelligence. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Expanding the role of medical oncologist in the management of COVID-19

Background: Cancer patients (pts) have been associated with severe SARS-CoV2 infection and higher mortality compared with the general population. This could be related to the limitation of therapeutic effort based on their prognosis and healthcare prioritization towards non-cancer pts. The oncologist’s role could be crucial for providing high-quality care. We aim to assess the impact of oncologists (ONC) on COVID-19 management. Methods: Multicentre retrospective analysis of cancer pts diagnosed with COVID-19 between Mar-Apr 2020. We classified pts according to an estimated life expectancy (based on tumor/stage/line) in 3 groups: favourable group (FG) mOS >5 years (y), intermediate (IG) 1-5y and poor (PG) <1y. We studied COVID-19 management based on oncologist’s involvement: mainly-ONC vs. mainly other specialists (Other). Primary endpoint: COVID-19 30-day mortality (early-M). Secondary outcomes: intensive care unit admission (ICUa), the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and antiretroviral treatment (ARVt) and immunomodulatory drugs (ImD) administered. Results: 287 pts were enrolled, median age 69 (35-98), 52% male, 67% with an active tumor (of them 76% had advanced stage). Mostly thoracic tumors (26%), followed by gastrointestinal (21%) and breast (19%). Among 170 pts under treatment, 89 (52%) received chemotherapy (CHT). By prognostic group: 49% were included in FG (n=135), 40% in IG (n=113), and 11% in PG (n=30). Overall early-M rate was 27% (ONC 22% vs. Other 27%). Prognostic groups were associated with early-M: 19% (FG) vs. 31% (IG) vs. 37% (PG) (p=0.022). No significant differences regarding rate of ARDS (23% FG vs. 19% IG vs. 17% PG). The ONC-group (n=18) included 4 PG and 14 IG, 94% had an advanced stage disease, 83% receive CHT and 65% had PS≥2 (p=0.05 compared to Other group). In IG (ONC vs. Other): 7% vs. 2% ICUa, 100% vs. 34% ARVt and 57% vs. 7% ImD (all p<0.001). In PG (ONC vs. Other): 25% vs. 0% ICUa, 75% vs. 34% ARVt and 25% vs. 0% ImD (all p<0.001). Finally, FP managed only by Other: 13% ICUa;33% ARVt and 13% ImD. Conclusions: Oncologist mostly treated complex pts compared to other specialists. During COVID-19 crisis, setting prognostic groups helped to individualized therapeutic approaches, reflected by less mortality rate and no differences in terms of complications. Legal entity responsible for the study: Aleix Prat. Funding: Has not received any funding. Disclosure: L. Ghiglione: Licensing/Royalties: Hibor;Licensing/Royalties: Kyowa Kirin;Licensing/Royalties: Vifor Pharma. E. Auclin: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Mundipharma;Licensing/Royalties: Sanofi Genzymes. S. Pilotto: Licensing/Royalties: AstraZeneca;Eli-Lilly;BMS;: Boehringer Ingelheim;MSD;Roche. A. Prat: Research grant/Funding (institution), Licensing/Royalties: Roche;Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Licensing/Royalties: Pfizer;Novartis;Amgen;Licensing/Royalties: BMS;Research grant/Funding (institution), Licensing/Royalties: Daiichi Sankyo;Advisory/Consultancy: Puma;Oncolytics Biotech;MSD;Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Lilly;Research grant/Funding (institution), Licensing/Royalties: Nanostring technologies;Officer/Board of Directors: Beast International Group (BIG);Solti's Foundation;Actitud frente al cancer Foundation;Solti;Research grant/Funding (institution): Boehringer;Sysmex Europa GmbH;Medica Scientia inno. Research, SL;Celgene, SLU;Astellas Pharma. L. Mezquita: Research grant/Funding (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, Licensing/Royalties: Bristol-Myers Squibb;Licensing/Royalties: Tecnofarma;Licensing/Royalties, International Mentorship Program: AstraZeneca;Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, Licensing/Royalties: Roche;Advisory/Consultancy: Roche Diagnostics;Research grant/Funding (self): Boehringer Ingelheim. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.